• Jeff Ely


Joint with Sandeep Baliga

We study torture as a mechanism for extracting information from a suspect who may or may not be informed. We show that a standard rationale for torture generates two commitment problems. First, the principal would benefit from a commitment to torture a suspect he knows to be innocent. Second, the principal would benefit from a commitment to limit the amount of torture faced by the guilty. We analyze a dynamic model of torture in which the credibility of these threats and promises is endogenous. We show that these commitment problems dramatically reduce the value of torture and can even render it completely ineffective. We use our model to address questions such as the effect of enhanced interrogation techniques, rights against indefinite detention, and delegation of torture to specialists.

Read here. 

Recent Posts

See All

Optimal Feedback in Contests

Joint with George Georgiads, Sina Khorasani and Luis Rayo We derive optimal contests for environments where output takes the form of breakthroughs and the principal has an informational advantage ove

Rotation as Contagion Mitigation

Joint with Andrea Galeotti and Jakub Steiner We study rotation schemes that govern individuals’ activities within an organization during an epidemic. We optimize the frequency of rotation and degree o

Optimal Test Allocation

Joint with Jakub Steiner and Andrea Galeotti A health authority chooses a binary action for each of several individuals that differ in their pre-test probabilities of being infected and in the additiv

Jeffrey Ely

Department of Economics

Northwestern University

2211 Campus Dr Evanston, IL 60208

Curriculum Vitae

©2019 by Jeffrey Ely.